|
citation
Citation ought to aid and inform the reader and acknowledge intellectual debt. If Birkerts has an argument to make, it concerns the distinction between the experience of transitory text on the screen and static text on the page. The same issue is central to Jay David Bolter's Writing Space. Is Birkerts rediscovering the same argument or is he trying to put forth an original thesis? A chapter of Lanham's The Electronic Word discusses in depth the interplay between immersive reading and appreciation of the book as artifact, situating this tension within a broad historical and epistemological context in the study of rhetoric: does Birkerts ignore Lanham to distance himself from Lanham's argument or simply because Birkerts overlooked the earlier work? The first edition of Landow's Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology situates hypermedia within a tradition of critical reading and interpretation; sections of Birkerts' monograph that recount the emotional, deeply personal, and redemptive power of reading might be taken to respond to Landow, but we cannot be certain that Birkerts knew Landow's work. Bolter, Landow, and Lanham reaches different conclusions; because the citations clearly are incomplete, we cannot know whether Birkerts is responding to them or is simply unaware of previous work.
|
top | development | bones and dust | not paying attention | after the elegy | circles of meaning |