What Is It Good For?
|
|
This and MATS are good
for plan formulation and evaluating
alternatives. While MATS helps show the comparative merits
between alternatives, this helps show the publics' perception
of how alternatives stack up. No alternative is going to provide
all of the solutions for all of the problems. If the public can
see that tradeoffs will have to be made, and if they can have
a hand in helping to determine those tradeoffs, then your process
has a much better chance of success.
The "trading cards" game will help you:
- Determine the relative importance of the alternative's
features or issues to various publics.
- Explore the publics' willingness to pay more for a feature
or to trade another for it.
- Sort and rank combinations of possible alternatives from
the publics' perspective
|
|
How Do I Use It?
|
|
Before you introduce this exercise, you must
have identified which options you want
the group to evaluate. You may want to run through the exercise
with a smaller core group to see if there are too many options
to handle.
To play:
- Recruit a small focus group representing various publics.
(You may break a large meeting into smaller groups and compare
notes at the end, or you may want to meet with several small
focus groups.)
- Prepare a series of cards for each participant. Each card
should detail one feature and its cost or other attribute. (Remember
that attribute can be positive or negative.)
- Have participants rank each card in order of preference
or perceived value.
- Create two or three different scenarios--what if you have
only three of these options? What if having option x meant that
you could not have option y? What if having option x meant that
you also needed to include either option a or b?
- For each scenario, have participants display which card
they would choose. (You may analyze each participant's choices
separately, assign number values and add up the rankings, or
have the group as a whole agree on what would be preferable.)
|
|