Complex Situations
|
Developing a strategy
or vision takes time and thought. What are your priorities?
What will be the best route to take to achieve your goals?
You can use the decision process to clarify where you
are going--and how you will get there.
These generic notes provide a sample product
from an application of the Decision Process Guidebook. In
this example, a group of senior level managers met for one
day to determine how their office would operate in the future.
Note: Click on the
name of the step to get more information about that step in the
process. |
|
|
|
|
|
Groundwork
|
Click on
to get back to the top |
|
|
Questions
|
|
Example:
|
This Session
Before the day long meeting, we worked
with key people to find out the issues and goals for this
session.
|
This office faces a major
change in mission and funding.
Managers wanted to address and develop
preliminary answers to:
- Where does the office want to go?
- How will we develop a roadmap to get
there?
|
Decisionmakers and Participants:
To determine who would need to be involved,
we asked:
- Who are the decisionmakers?
- Who will influence the decision?
How?
|
Everybody is a decisionmaker
here:
- Employees will
decide whether to support the new direction and will
have some input into where this office goes.
- This management group
can propose actions and accomplishments
- Budget people (at
all levels of Reclamation, OPM, and Congress) will determine
funding and constraints
- Congress and the Administration
will set overall goals.
|
|
|
Step 1, Needs
|
Needs help determine
what the program will address-and why the program exists.
Catalogue the various perceptions
of needs from various publics. |
|
|
Needs and problems
- Who wants what?
- What are the needs?
We discussed the history of the office
and area, the constituents, and issues in the area. This
background gave us a chance to briefly categorize needs
for the office and the area. |
|
Mission
Our mission is to manage and develop
water resources in the West (particularly this area, which
comprises three watersheds and a large Federal project
that supplies water). Construction is completed so now
we need to organize to manage water resources effectively.
|
Role--What is the role of this office?
|
- Develop new programs.
- Get people involved in identifying
problems
- We need a process for identifying
water resource management problems, in conjunction with
our partners and clients.
|
Water management-- how will the basin use Project
water?
|
- Agricultural ability to afford Project
water.
- More flexibility with water deliveries
for agriculture i.e., under 5 acres.
- Surface and groundwater are limited.
H ow do we help locals make smart management choices?
- Good baseline data on groundwater
and surface water amounts interactions is lacking. How
do we obtain the data we need for programs such as groundwater
recharge, state water bank.?
- Drought management is an important
issue in this area. How can we work with other entities
to address it? (i.e., local/state/federal cooperation
and integration of systems and decision authority)
- Waste water infrastructure
- Water quality concerns.
- Rural community growth affecting perennial
- rivers base flow.
- Water conservation and drought relief
issues.
|
Employees--how do we *downsize* and keep the expertise
we need?
|
- We'll have more work than people or
money
- How do we decide who to tell no to?
- We can't lose all the designers.
- How do we deal with morale? Employees
left feel abandoned
- Less money for everyone, (local, state
and federal)
- How do we combine efforts to get the
best bang for the buck.?
|
|
|
Step 2, Objective
|
Develop objectives to
focus the program. Determine the objectives (those needs
that your process may help to meet). You may need to spend
some time separating out underlying real needs from positions.
The rest of the decision process will focus on meeting
these objectives. |
|
|
Goals, Objectives
- What do we want the solution accomplish?
- What will this solution do in 5
years? in ten? in fifty? in a century?
|
|
Objectives will neeed to
be fleshed out to be compatible with Congress' and the
Administration's priorities. The main goal is to develop
a roadmap for our office to share with personnel, agency.
Places on this roadmap will include: |
Water availability and management: |
- Identify options - implement solutions
- Identify issues - become sensitive
|
Role
|
- Transition from project to service
- define relationships, clarify role.
- Educate others about process.
|
Customers
|
- Find ways to coordinate $
- Develop support
- Respond to customer needs
- Reduce overhead
|
Program Development
|
- Develop vision future program
- What kind of work
|
Budget |
- Develop long range planning
- Develop realistic budgets
- Respond to cost needs (time)
|
Staff
|
- Educate staff about programs.
- Develop staff expertise - change in
job -
- evaluate who can do job.
|
|
|
Step 3, Resources
|
Resources and constraints
let you figure out what you have to work with and what
the boundaries of the study are.
Determine the relationships and influences
between available resources (physical, social, and political).
These resources provide a reality check--- they determine
how you will be able to meet the objectives.
Many resources also carry constraints
with them. For example, authorizing legislation provides
the authority to conduct the program as well as sideboards
for scope, time, etc. |
|
|
What you have to work with
- What resources do we have to solve
the problem?
- What don't we have?
- What are the limits?
We brainstormed resources and catalogued
this list after the meeting to have something to build
on. |
|
- Formal and informal agreement -
- relationships
- Organizational flexibility
- Set up group to work on rural
- Opportunity to change role
- Non-traditional constituencies - lobby
- Politics
- Local
- Federal
- Input to budget process
- Guidebook
- Reclamation Manual
- Ability to set priorities
- Time
- Funding source
- Other Agencies - like minded needs
|
Constraints |
- Unclear priorities
- Time Constraint
- Staffing - New People - no guarantee
of skill level
- Lack of understanding among people
on budget
- Lack of basic understanding of technical
principles
- Need to develop information on basicprinciples
- Different needs, cultures, levels
ofunderstanding
- Politics
- Local
- Administration (Fed)
- Budget:
- Staff
- Credibility
- Authority
- NEPA - Federal regulations
- Compliance requirements, $ regulations,
procurement
|
|
|
Step 4, Options
|
Options or components
of solutions provide multiple ways to address each objective.
Consider all options presented at
this point--they'll winnowed down later. |
|
|
TIP: Go WILD! Have some fun. |
|
|
What are
your options?
- What can participants do?
- What can your team do?
We reviewed the background material before
the meeting to list options already discovered. In the
meeting, we brainstormed and invited participants to write
their options on a flipchart. |
|
- Specific options for this area were
discussed, along with some generic proposals:
|
No Action
|
Always throw in
the no action option (retire, quit, refuse to get involved
at a Federal level) so that you can measure how
much you truly need to act. |
|
|
- Quit
- Retire
- Keep on going in the same manner
|
Programs and Mission
|
- Develop overall programs and priorities
- Partnership & Coordination - Slowly
expand
- Assist state agencies in their mission
- Look at justification
- Develop criteria
- Shotgun approach
- Continue to be reactive
- Continue to have feelers
- Build in checks - 5 years from now
- Continue new exploration
|
Funding
|
- Find ways to request $
- Request $ for rural projects
- Educate people - lobby for $
- Change way we budget
- Get solicitors, others to share funding
- Cost share with state, agencies -
help figure
- out problems, develop priorities,
expertise
- Use our $ as a catalyst, seed
- Use authority - non traditional
|
Budget
|
- Zero-based budgeting - Administer
program by building from bottom
- New budget formulation
- Expand corporate budgeting to whole
office
|
Priorities
|
- Develop means to prioritize and choose
our role
- Decide priorities - How to narrow
- Attack worst problem first
- Look at commissioner's goals
- Talk to areas, regions with successful
projects
- Get the camel's nose under the tent
|
|
|
Step 5, Screening Criteria
|
Determine standards
that each option must meet in order to work and weed fatal
flaws.
Apply the criteria to each option
consistently to develop a set of viable options.
|
|
|
Train wrecks, fatal flaws, things that blow up
- What won't work? Why?
- At what point won't it work?
These items are your screening criteria.
At this point, the group screened specific
options, developed various alternatives (5 year visions
for the office), and discussed possible evaluation criteria.
The facilitators provided extensive notes, which the group
has used as a basis for developing strategies and priorities
for the office.
|
|
- Be implementable by next FY
- Meet overall Reclamation, administration
goals
- Match Federal Objectives
- Be doable with current staff levels
- Be compatible with and work with other
Federal, state, tribal, private entities
- Meet all existing responsibilities
|
|
|
Step 6, Alternatives
|
Combine options to form
alternatives. Develop a wide range of alternatives including
no action. Check each alternative to ensure that it meets
the objectives. |
|
|
Get a wide range of alternatives. After developing
each alternative, ask:
- Will it fulfill the objectives?
- Will it work?
- Can it be supported?
- Can it be improved and refined?
When you refine alternatives, run
them through the screening criteria to make sure you don't
include fatal flaws.
|
|
To develop alternatives,
the team needed to do some research:
- What specific opportunities exist
in the area for Reclamation involvement?
- Where can Reclamation make a difference?
- How can we work with other Reclamation
offices?
- What are the priorities of the Administration
and Congress?
|
|
|
Step 7, Evaluation
|
Determine priorities:
What do you need to consider
so that an alternative best fits your situation?
What will drive the decision?
What is important to you?
|
|
|
Develop evaluation criteria to rank the alternatives.
Perform analyses and weigh tradeoffs to compare alternatives.
The team met again to discuss alternatives.
Priorities were developed to judge alternatives.
|
|
- Have partnership and support from
the communities
- Work to promote efficient water development
in the area and the West
- Ensure water supplies for the long
term
- Meet administrative, congressional
priorities
|
|
|
Step 8, Selection
|
TIP:
Think about how the selection process
will work throughout the action to avoid possible delays
and surprises. |
|
|
Decision
The people identified in Groundwork (above) look at all the tradeoffs and select what
best meets the needs and objectives at the moment.
Then they set up a plan to ensure
this works--and to revisit it later.
|
|
A plan wll be presented
through the Budget Review Committee and other venues.
|
|
|
Step 9, Implement
|
TIP: Keep this step
in the forefront at all times. |
|
|
Identify and fund responsible implementors to carry
out the decision. Find and communicate with newly affected
and interested publics.
|
|
Implementation will be
through every action in the office. We will need good
communication between all groups and employees to ensure
we focus on our priorities and vision. |
|
|
Step 10, Monitor and Follow up
|
Make sure the solution continues to work by providing
for maintenance and operation of physical structures and
administration of institutional solutions. Examine the
situation and modify the solution when necessary. Afterwards,
discuss the decision process and let others know what
worked and what didn't. Carry these lessons over into
future problem-solving efforts. |
|
The team will meet every
year to ensure that actions and programs fit within the
overall vision.
|
|
|
|
|
Go On |
|
|